Relative Risk is a general term for measures of association calculated from the data in a 2x2 table. Used in cohort studies. In which type of study design is it most commonly used?

Prepare for the REHS/EPH Test with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Gain insights, use helpful hints, and detailed explanations. Ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

Relative Risk is a general term for measures of association calculated from the data in a 2x2 table. Used in cohort studies. In which type of study design is it most commonly used?

Explanation:
Relative Risk compares how often an outcome occurs in two groups—those exposed to a factor versus those not exposed—by looking at incidence over time. It requires actual risk data, which you get when you follow people and see who develops the outcome; in a 2x2 table this is the ratio of the incidence in the exposed group to the incidence in the unexposed group (RR = [a/(a+b)] / [c/(c+d)]). This direct risk comparison is most straightforward in cohort studies, where you start with disease-free individuals and track them to observe new cases. In case-control studies you start with cases and controls, so you can’t measure incidence directly and rely on the odds ratio instead; cross-sectional studies measure prevalence rather than incidence, and ecological studies use population-level data, making true relative risk less interpretable.

Relative Risk compares how often an outcome occurs in two groups—those exposed to a factor versus those not exposed—by looking at incidence over time. It requires actual risk data, which you get when you follow people and see who develops the outcome; in a 2x2 table this is the ratio of the incidence in the exposed group to the incidence in the unexposed group (RR = [a/(a+b)] / [c/(c+d)]). This direct risk comparison is most straightforward in cohort studies, where you start with disease-free individuals and track them to observe new cases. In case-control studies you start with cases and controls, so you can’t measure incidence directly and rely on the odds ratio instead; cross-sectional studies measure prevalence rather than incidence, and ecological studies use population-level data, making true relative risk less interpretable.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy